By Glauco D’Agostino
The warlike nature of the State of Israel is nothing new. What is considered the only democracy in the Middle East has a propensity for war in line with its ideological and international alliances. Today’s attack on the Embassy of the Islamic Republic of Iran in Damascus corresponds to an act of war intended to raise international tension. It is not the first time, mind you, that Tel Aviv’s provocations have affected Syria, considered the weak link in the fight against ISIS. We have seen the appeasement towards terrorist groups used to attack targets of nations involved in the war on terrorism over the last decade in Iran, Afghanistan, Lebanon and everywhere throughout the Middle East. The result of impunity Eretz Israel has enjoyed due to the “compliance” of the West (if the term has a meaning) towards war crimes of over-protected ideological allies.
This is not the time for silence towards the ineptitude of intimidating and influencing intelligence. This inefficiency leads to the inevitability of a war, which will not be like those experienced in recent decades, with populations tortured and, in many cases, annihilated by “smart” bombs, while the oligarchies of the dominant countries feasted on champagne and caviar (illegally imported from Russia and Iran due to the “unfair” and, at the same time, hypocritical sanctions). We are about to sink into the abyss due to the incompetence of squalid intelligence no longer responding to the deep state that once guaranteed security.
Islamic World Analyzes has always walked the paths of peace, and mutual ethnic and religious understanding. Since the 2000s, economic-financial and lobbying circles have been fomenting identity-based and national opposition in any way to achieve the objective of confrontation at all costs. The United States of America, towards which we have always aimed our arrows as the dominant and indisputable power, is no longer the dominant and indisputable power and therefore not the only or major culprit. We’ve been saying this for years. The blame (if the question were ethical) should be directed towards his pleasure-loving vassals of the past, who today, in the throes of alcohol and drug intoxication with which they are joyfully inundated, are unable to evaluate the dangers for their interests and those of humanity.
Awareness of the changes underway is fundamental for the safety of people. History is useful for building the future. But history is not conservation, it is not legitimate for it to be so in an era of technological revolutions that will upset our future. Intelligence dominated by Artificial Intelligence makes us smile a little. We try to raise the issue at the level of the elite and public opinion, but the former is now in the pay of the dominant democratic oligarchs, satiated with the lavish benefits naively granted by the American “allies”, the latter is now in the hands of the “influencers” of every sort of men clouding his mind.
Is a solution the Europe of bureaucrats and oligarchs? That of ethnic and religious intolerance? That of generalised malfeasance and unlikely Criminal Courts? Is that of states with nuclear military capability instigating the involvement of their citizens in destructive wars without hope or a future? With the complacency of the proud intelligence? Maybe, here’s the problem, intelligence.
Europe, get up!
